ABSTRACT
Objective: This study investigated the relationship between intimate partner violence (IPV) experienced both before and during the COVID-19 pandemic and increased economic insecurity in food, phone/internet services, health care, and housing. We also assessed sociodemographic differences associated with increased economic insecurity among women and transgender/nonbinary adults since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. Method: An online, cross-sectional survey was administered to a general population sample of women and transgender individuals in one Midwestern state (N = 1,169). Results: IPV victimization during stay-at-home orders was associated with approximately three times higher odds of housing insecurity (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 3.06, p < .001) and increased health care insecurity (AOR = 2.95, p < .001) than those without victimization during stay-at-home orders, even after adjusting for IPV immediately prior to the pandemic. Multiracial, pregnant, and sexual minority (defined as lesbian, gay, bisexual, queer, or other sexual orientation [LGBQ +]) women and transgender/nonbinary individuals were at elevated risk for specific forms of increased insecurity. Conclusions: Findings highlight the need for continued COVID-19 legislation that enhances housing and rental support for populations most in need of safe and stable housing, particularly survivors of IPV. Reduced access to health care limits IPV opportunities for intervention and treatment. Expanding accessible and affordable health care options during the COVID-19 pandemic can enhance the safety and well-being of survivors and increase opportunities for providers to screen for IPV. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved)
ABSTRACT
Measures to contain the global COVID-19 pandemic led to stay-at-home orders across the world, accompanied by fears of a global surge in intimate partner violence (IPV). We administered an online general-population survey to 1169 women and transgender/nonbinary individuals throughout the state of Michigan in June-August 2020 to assess changes in the prevalence, severity, and correlates of IPV during the COVID-19 pandemic. Quota sampling was used to match the racial/ethnic and urban/rural distribution of the state. More than one in seven (15.1%) participants reported physical, sexual, psychological, or technology-facilitated IPV since COVID, similar to the prevalence in the 3 months before COVID (16.2%). However, there were indications that IPV severity increased and that novel cases of IPV are occurring in relationships that previously had no abuse. A majority (64.2%) of individuals who experienced IPV since COVID reported that the IPV was new to the relationship (34.1%) or of increased severity during COVID-19 (26.6%), representing 9.7% of the overall sample. New or increased IPV was significantly more prevalent among those who were essential workers, pregnant, unable to afford rent, unemployed/underemployed or had recent changes to their job, had partners with recent changes to employment, and those who had gotten tested or tested positive for COVID-19. Urban residence, trans/nonbinary identity, and having a toddler were more strongly associated with IPV during COVID as compared to before COVID. While findings do not support significant changes in the overall prevalence of IPV, the majority of survivors reported incident IPV in relationships that had not previously been abusive, or IPV that became more severe since the start of the pandemic. Cases of new or increased IPV were more concentrated in marginalized groups. Potential touchpoints for outreach and services during future lockdowns include prenatal and pediatric settings, daycares, employers of essential workers, and COVID-19 testing centers. Policies providing rental, childcare, and unemployment support may mitigate increases in IPV during COVID-19.